, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comment to EPA here: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259 (The deadline was extended to August 16th, due to massive protest.)

The attached letter is signed by nearly 1000 scientists who raise important concerns regarding the proposed Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science rule. As a scientist and citizen, I believe the concerns are valid and should be heeded.
Thank you,
Joseph Ceradini

Emphasis our own. Letter submitted to both the EPA and the US House (Congress). Originals here with names (over 900 pages): https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-0070. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF18/20180426/108218/HHRG-115-IF18-20180426-SD036.pdf

This is apparently a back-door attempt to increase radiation exposure by 400 times what is currently allowed by the EPA: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2018/05/09/trump-pruitt-nuclear-hit-job-on-the-epa-american-people-may-increase-radiation-exposure-by-400x-how-quickly-will-everyone-die/

Tweet on the topic: