, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By invading Ukraine in 2014, Russia already killed any hope for a nuclear weapons free world. After Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for protection, no country will ever give up its nuclear weapons again. And, more will try to obtain them. Yet some who allege to be anti-nuclear activists are still running offensive/defensive cover for Putin, even as he attempts to kill Ukraine and threatens nuclear war. By doing so, they are only convincing people that their real motive was the denuclearization and demilitarization of the west, while Russia, China, and India keep their weapons. And, people must stop promoting Putin’s lie that modern day Poland is anywhere near Russia. Belarus and Ukraine lie between it and Russia. Kaliningrad is occupied Europe and unconnected to the Russian mainland.

Finnish President: Putin Is Clearly Making a Nuclear Threathttps://youtu.be/SXNHgvVqWSU

How realistic is Vladimir Putin’s nuclear threat? Frustrated by a lack of military progress in Ukraine, the Russian president has put his country’s nuclear arms on high alert”. By Thomas O Falk Published On 3 Mar 2022 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/3/how-realistic-is-vladimir-putins-nuclear-threat

Russian entrepreneur offers $1M bounty for ‘war criminal’ Vladimir Putin’s arrest“ By Lee Brown March 3, 2022 1:53pm Updated https://nypost.com/2022/03/03/russian-entrepreneur-offers-1m-for-vladimir-putins-arrest/

By invading Ukraine in 2014, Russia already killed any hope for a nuclear weapons free world. After Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for protection, no country will ever give up its nuclear weapons again. And, more will try to obtain them. Yet some who alleged to be anti-nuclear activists are running defense/offense cover for Putin. Russia, the UK and the US made the following promises in 1994, renewed in 2009, in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear arsenal. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov actually signed the memo. (See entire memo at link). Russia’s violated the first three. 
They promised 

1. “to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine”;

2. “to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations”;

3. “to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind;

4. “to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used” See more here: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2022/01/22/budapest-memo-ukraine-gave-up-worlds-third-largest-nuclear-weapons-arsenal-in-exchange-for-security-assurances-respect-of-ukraine-territorial-integrity/ ] As for the fourth one, Russia would have to protect against themselves, since they are the aggressors!

Joint Statement of the Leaders of the Five Nuclear-Weapon States on Preventing Nuclear War and Avoiding Arms Races JANUARY 03, 2022 STATEMENTS AND RELEASES
The People’s Republic of China, the French Republic, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America consider the avoidance of war between Nuclear-Weapon States and the reduction of strategic risks as our foremost responsibilities.

 We affirm that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.  As nuclear use would have far-reaching consequences, we also affirm that nuclear weapons—for as long as they continue to exist—should serve defensive purposes, deter aggression, and prevent war.  We believe strongly that the further spread of such weapons must be prevented. 

We reaffirm the importance of addressing nuclear threats and emphasize the importance of preserving and complying with our bilateral and multilateral non-proliferation, disarmament, and arms control agreements and commitments.  We remain committed to our Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligations, including our Article VI obligation “to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.”

We each intend to maintain and further strengthen our national measures to prevent unauthorized or unintended use of nuclear weapons.  We reiterate the validity of our previous statements on de-targeting, reaffirming that none of our nuclear weapons are targeted at each other or at any other State. 

We underline our desire to work with all states to create a security environment more conducive to progress on disarmament with the ultimate goal of a world without nuclear weapons with undiminished security for all.  We intend to continue seeking bilateral and multilateral diplomatic approaches to avoid military confrontations, strengthen stability and predictability, increase mutual understanding and confidence, and prevent an arms race that would benefit none and endanger all.  We are resolved to pursue constructive dialogue with mutual respect and acknowledgment of each other’s security interests and concerns.