Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BREAKING: Defending The Republic Sues DOD, FDA & others on behalf of our military who decline vaccination 10/06/2021 3:00PM EST

Today, Defending the Republic, through our local counsel, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government – including Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, and FDA Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock – on behalf of 16 active-duty military service members in support of their right to refuse the unconstitutional and unlawful COVID-19 vaccine mandate. These service members, which include those with natural immunity to COVID-19, women who wish to become pregnant, or who have medical conditions for which no clinical trial data is available, face severe punishment, including dishonorable discharge, the loss of their constitutional rights, and potential imprisonment if they do not get these experimental vaccines that they have every right to refuse
 
The core claims raised in the lawsuit ask the court to bar the FDA and DOD from using deceptive “bait and switch” tactics and to uphold the constitutional right of every citizen to refuse an unwanted, unnecessary and unproven vaccine.

The “bait and switch” involves the FDA’s approval of the Comirnaty vaccine, which is not available, while the FDA and DOD instead seek to administer the experimental, unapproved version of the vaccine (which cannot be mandated) to trick service members to forfeit their rights to informed consent and to refuse an experimental vaccine. 
 
This lawsuit also challenges the FDA’s unlawful “approval” of the Comirnaty Vaccine. This approval violated the Administrative Procedure Act, contradicted the FDA’s own rules, was based on flawed and incomplete scientific studies, and was made despite unprecedented numbers of adverse events – including deaths – related to the vaccine. The FDA also acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, in that it excluded certain groups from clinical trials, including those with previous COVID-19 infection and pregnant women. 
 
Through the filing of this lawsuit, we make clear that these service members – those who serve their country with honor – are not the property of the U.S. government, and the Constitution does not allow them to be treated as such.
”See news release, the lawsuit and more here: https://defendingtherepublic.org/covid/

As of September 13th, BioNTech-Pfizer don’t plan to produce the approved Comirnaty “for the next few months”, which would appear to mean until at least mid December. Since they have extended use of vials of the Emergency Order BioNTech vaccine three months after expiration date (i.e. until May 2022) in both the US and Canada, they apparently don’t intend to make it for awhile.

There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/types-applications/investigational-new-drug-ind-application#Introduction

Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. https://www.fhi360.org/sites/all/libraries/webpages/fhi-retc2/Resources/nuremburg_code.pdf

Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3 ….

EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/default.aspx ….” See: “2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine – Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries”. By  Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Meryl Nass, M.D. 08/24/21 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/

A MSM reporter alleged to have called one US pharmacy who allegedly claimed to have Comirnaty, but they apparently didn’t bother to even go see what the vial said. It is almost certain that whoever answered the phone was confused, ignorant or lying.

This news release appears to make it clear that it’s not available.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
Pfizer received FDA BLA license for its COVID-19 vaccine
Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.

At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution.

As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels”. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/dailymed-announcements-details.cfm?date=2021-09-13

The emergency use authorization apparently allows BioNTech-Pfizer to say that vials can be used even if expired. So, they are now allowing it to be used for three months after the expiration date, in both the US and Canada.

Pfizer Canada says that “vials of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine with an expiry date of August 2021 through February 2022 printed on the label may remain in use for 3 months beyond the printed date as long as all approved storage conditions have been maintainedhttps://archive.vn/MnNTM

The US FDA is allowing the same thing – allowing use of expired vials. This is apparently only allowed under emergency use authorization: https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
They appear to have too much of the old, unapproved, BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine on hand, and they want to get shot of it, by any means possible.