, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Good news that there is more than one US Senator challenging the election results, though only one is required. US Senator Hawley is no longer alone. The Reuters poll cited is from November 18, 2020. A lot more people should know that there is a problem by now, despite the mainstream media cover-up. It would seem obvious that Thomson-Reuters, which is located in the same town as Dominion voting systems (Toronto, Ontario), wouldn’t do a new poll and we wouldn’t trust it if they did. Canadians have a field day plundering US jobs, too (temp and permanent) – their workers come and the jobs go (e.g. Detroit jobs went to Windsor, Ontario) and they benefit from an undervalued dollar, that is worth less than the US dollar. Canada is a back-door for immigration, including terrorists, as well. Whatever Cruz or anyone else says, the vote for US President is by US House delegations (US States). The Senate decides the VP. There is a real risk, however, that we may have President Trump and VP Kamala Harris. We would prefer Biden-Pence or Trump-Biden — anyone but Kamala Iyer Harris. However, the whole Biden Presidency idea is nothing but a back-door attempt to shoe-horn in Kamala Harris, because everyone hates her. She is a marriage of the Hindu Brahmin-run IT sector and the old elites (Getty-Newsom), and they are hell-bent to impose her upon us. Furthermore, she was born to a mother from India (Dominion), and raised in Canada (Dominion), and her father came to the United States on a British scholarship from Jamaica, which was still part of the UK. With a high number of ostensibly US Senators in bed with India (India caucus), however, the future looks bleak. There isn’t a list of the Senate China caucus. Ironically, Cruz was born in Canada, and Mississippi born Kennedy educated at Oxford, UK, rather than Oxford Mississippi. No Kamala VP! No backroom deals! The 1877 election was decided with a backroom deal. Beware dangerous backroom deals!

Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville
January 2, 2021
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) issued the following statement in advance of the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021:

“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.

“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.

“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.

“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes. “And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).

“Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.

“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.

“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.

“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.

“At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.

“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.

“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

“We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise.

But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.

“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”

US Dominion or Republic?
A dominion was one of the initially semi-independent countries, and later fully independent countries, under the British Crown that constituted the British Empire.[1][2] “Dominion status” was a constitutional term of art used to signify a Commonwealth realm; they included Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, South Africa, and the Irish Free State. India, Pakistan, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), Nigeria, Kenya, and other former colonies were also dominions for short periods of time. The Balfour Declaration of 1926 recognised the Dominions as “autonomous communities within the British Empire”, and the 1931 Statute of Westminster confirmed their full legislative independence. Earlier usage of dominion to refer to a particular territory dates back to the 16th century and was used to describe Wales from 1535 to 1801. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion

Soon the King’s Dominions…