, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comment: It’s pretty clear now that this will be ignored or slow-walked by a Supreme Court, which includes numerous judges that worked as lawyers on behalf of Bush-Cheney, i.e. Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett. Dominion Voting systems includes a board member, Bill Kennard, who was with the Carlyle Group. This time around Biden-Harris = Bush-Cheney. Do those sitting on the US Supreme Court want what Matt Gaetz has called “Forever Wars” or is it because Kamala Harris covered for Catholic pedophile priests? Did something happen during the Catholic schooling of Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett? At Roberts’ presumably all-boys boarding school that he fears would come out? Or something else? Surely, it’s more than Judge John Roberts’ missing college paper: “Marxism and Bolshevism: Theory and Practice”? Was he the John Roberts on Epstein’s flight logs? The Supreme Court should have taken the Texas case. Why didn’t they?

News Release:

Mayor Rudolph J. Giuliani, the Trump campaign’s lead attorney, today announced that the campaign filed a petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that allowed over 50,000 illegal absentee ballots in violation of Article II of the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin law.

The filing seeks expedited consideration before the January 6 Congressional review of the Electoral College votes. This marks the second Constitutional challenge to illegal mail voting filed by the Campaign, following a petition from Pennsylvania filed on December 20.

According to President Trump’s lead Wisconsin attorney, Jim Troupis: “Regrettably, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, in their 4-3 decision, refused to address the merits of our claim. This ‘Cert Petition’ asks them to address our claims, which, if allowed, would change the outcome of the election in Wisconsin.” Troupis noted, “Three members of the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, agreed with many of the President’s claims in written dissents from that court’s December 14 order.”

Professor John Eastman, a constitutional scholar at the Claremont Institute, also noted: “The petition challenging the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to allow partisan state and local election officials to ignore key anti-fraud provisions of Wisconsin law is extremely persuasive. The federal constitutional issues raised by the case cannot be more clear. Article II of the Constitution, as interpreted in Bush v. Gore, assigns to the ‘legislature’ the plenary power to determine the manner of choosing presidential electors, not executive officials, un-elected bureaucrats, or even the state’s judiciary. That authority was eviscerated in Wisconsin, resulting in more than 50,000 illegal ballots being cast and counted.”

The Trump Petition raises a number of issues, including:
– More than 28,000 votes were counted from people who failed to provide identification by abusing the state’s “indefinitely confined” status, including two Biden electors.
– Nearly 6,000 absentee ballots were counted that were contained in incomplete and altered ballot envelopes that the Wisconsin statutes expressly forbid.
– More than 17,000 ballots were collected by hand, in direct contravention of the statutes, in Democrat-sponsored events in Madison in September and October.

Click here to read the Petition https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-biden-petition-appendix-final.pdf
Click here to read the Motion for Expedited Consideration.