, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trump himself was involved as Individual 1. Who is individual 2? Trump Jr.? Is Russiagate all about Trump Tower Moscow, aka the “Moscow Project”, which continued to be discussed through at least June 2016? The Russian development company mentioned must be Aras Agalarov’s Crocus Group/International.

Trump Towers Istanbul Turkey

Agalarovs’ Crocus Group – Crocus City Mall, Moscow

Is Russiagate all about Trump Tower Moscow, aka the “Moscow Project”, which continued to be discussed through at least June 2016? The Russian development company mentioned must be Aras Agalarov’s Crocus Group/Crocus International.

Is Russiagate all about another Trump phallic symbol? Individual 1 is Trump. Is individual 2 Trump Jr?

Related: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2017/07/17/trump-lawyer-kasowitz-defends-russian-gov-sberbank-sberbank-was-to-fund-trump-tower-moscow-is-russiagate-all-about-another-trump-phallic-symbol/

Note the phrase: “Individual 2 wrote to COHEN, “It’s about [the President of Russia] they called today

Excerpts (see entire document below): “From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017, MICHAEL COHEN, the defendant, was an attorney and employee of a Manhattan-based real estate company (the “Company”). COHEN held the title of “Executive Vice President” and “Special Counsel” to the owner of the Company (“Individual 1”)

his efforts at the Company to pursue a branded property in Moscow, Russia (the “Moscow Project”)

The Moscow Project was discussed multiple times within the Company and did not end in January 2016. Instead, as late as approximately June 2016, COHEN and Individual 2 discussed efforts to obtain Russian governmental approval for the Moscow Project. COHEN discussed the status and progress of the Moscow Project with Individual 1 on more than the three occasions COHEN claimed to the Committee, and he briefed family members of Individual 1 within the Company about the project.

b. COHEN agreed to travel to Russia in connection with the Moscow Project and took steps in contemplation of Individual 1’s possible travel to Russia. COHEN and Individual 2 discussed on multiple occasions traveling to Russia to pursue the Moscow Project.

i. COHEN asked Individual 1 about the possibility of Individual 1 traveling to Russia in connection with the Moscow Project, and asked a senior campaign official about potential business travel to Russia.

ii. On or about May 4, 2016, Individual 2 wrote to COHEN, “I had a chat with Moscow. ASSUMING the trip does happen the question is before or after the convention . . . Obviously the pre-meeting trip (you only) can happen anytime you want but the 2 big guys where [sic] the question. I said I would confirm and revert.” COHEN responded, “My trip before Cleveland. [Individual 1] once he becomes the nominee after the convention.”

iii. On or about May 5, 2016, Individual 2 followed up with COHEN and wrote, “[Russian Official 1] would like to invite you as his guest to the St. Petersburg Forum which is Russia’s Davos it’s June 16-19. He wants to meet there with you and possibly introduce you to either [the President of Russia] or [the Prime Minister of Russia], as they are not sure if 1 or both will be there… He said anything you want to discuss including dates and subjects are on the table to discuss.”

iv. On or about May 6, 2016, Individual 2 asked COHEN to confirm those dates would work for him to travel. COHEN wrote back, “Works for me.”

v. From on or about June 9 to June 14, 2016, Individual 2 sent numerous messages to COHEN about the travel, including forms for COHEN to complete. However, on or about June 14, 2016, COHEN met Individual 2 in the lobby of the Company’s headquarters to inform Individual 2 he would not be traveling at that time.

c. COHEN did recall that in or around January 2016, COHEN received a response from the office of Russian Official 1, the Press Secretary for the President of Russia, and spoke to a member of that office about the Moscow Project.

i. On or about January 14, 2016, COHEN emailed Russian Official 1’s office asking for assistance in connection with the Moscow Project. On or about January 16, 2016, COHEN emailed Russian Official 1’s office again, said he was trying to reach another high-level Russian official, and asked for someone who spoke English to contact him.

ii. On or about January 20, 2016, COHEN received an email from the personal assistant to Russian Official 1 (“Assistant 1”), stating that she had been trying to reach COHEN and requesting that he call her using a Moscow-based phone number she provided.

iii. Shortly after receiving the email, COHEN called Assistant 1 and spoke to her for approximately 20 minutes. On that call, COHEN described his position at the Company and outlined the proposed Moscow Project, including the Russian development company with which the Company had partnered. COHEN requested assistance in moving the project forward, both in securing land to build the proposed tower and financing the construction. Assistant 1 asked detailed questions and took notes, stating that she would follow up with others in Russia.

iv. The day after COHEN’s call with Assistant 1, Individual 2 contacted him, asking for a call. Individual 2 wrote to COHEN, “It’s about [the President of Russia] they called today.”

First Michael Cohen’s lies before the committee are laid out. Then, the truth (seen above) is laid out on subsequent pages.




Vekselberg and cousin Intrater arrive Trump Tower Jan. 9, 2017, ca 648 pm