"Russian Interference in the 2016 United States Election”, Assange, Assange Indictment, indictment, Mueller, New York Times, pornography, Russian investigation, Seitu Sulayman Kokayi, terrorism, Washington Post, WikiLeaks
Why does the NY Times, as well as WaPo and others, assume that it was mistakenly? It could be clerical error but appears intentional, either by Mueller to flush out someone or something, or to warn Assange. Shake the tree and watch the monkeys jump out. It’s almost certain that Assange is working with Mueller, as Embassy life has gotten old, and this is shaking the tree time. 🙂 Roger Stone in a panic? Or did he flip too?
NYTimes: “Indictment vs. Julian Assange Mistakenly Revealed by Prosecutors” “It is not clear if charges have been filed. A case against Mr. Assange could have implications for the special counsel inquiry as well as the publication of government secrets.” See: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/us/politics/julian-assange-indictment-wikileaks.html
According to the Washington Post’s “Julian Assange has been charged, prosecutors reveal inadvertently in court filing“: “The filing in the Eastern District of Virginia came Aug. 22 in a case that combines national security and sex trafficking. Seitu Sulayman Kokayi, 29, was charged with enticing a 15-year-old girl to have sex with him and send him pornographic images of herself. But he was detained in part because he “has a substantial interest in terrorist acts,” according to the court filing…”