Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/Pages/Emoluments/Emoluments_Joint_Recommendation_20180815.pdf
Domestic and Foreign Emoluments clauses:


http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/Pages/Emoluments/default.aspx
July 25th 2018 ruling: http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/News%20Documents/Emoluments_Opinion_denying_MTD.PDF
November 2, 2018 ruling: https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/401/13137/Trump-ruling.pdf
August 15, 2018: http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/Pages/Emoluments/Emoluments_Joint_Recommendation_20180815.pdf

U.S. judge refuses to delay suit against Trump over foreign payments
Posted:Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:55:16 -0400
A federal judge on Friday rejected a bid by President Donald Trump’s administration to delay a lawsuit alleging that his business dealings have violated a constitutional anti-corruption provision, moving the case toward the crucial evidence-gathering
” process.http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/PoliticsNews/~3/jBK0D28hYcE/u-s-judge-refuses-to-delay-suit-against-trump-over-foreign-payments-idUSKCN1N72CK

President Trump’s continued ownership interest in a global business empire, which renders him deeply enmeshed with a legion of foreign and domestic government actors, violates the Constitution, calling into question the rule of law and the integrity of our political system,” the complaint states.” (Read the entire news release from the Offices of US Attorneys General Maryland and DC, June 2017, further below)

Attorney General Frosh’s Statement on Court Denying President Trump’s Attempt to Delay Discovery in Emoluments Lawsuit BALTIMORE, MD (November 2, 2018) – Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh today released the following statement:

“The President’s latest attempt to block our emoluments lawsuit has failed once again. We are gratified that the court has denied the President’s efforts to keep our case from proceeding to discovery. Today’s decision affirms once again that Maryland and the District of Columbia have standing to sue, with the court emphasizing that the President’s proposed definition of the term emolument is ‘exceedingly strained’ and would prohibit only ‘what is tantamount to a bribe.’ We agree with the court that the President’s motion was nothing more than an attempt to delay the ultimate resolution of our lawsuit, a tactic that the court said ‘as a matter of justice, cannot be countenanced.’http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/press/2018/110218.pdf



Emphasis our own. Original pdf with link to full case embedded found here: http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/press/2017/061217.pdf Additional info found here: http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/Pages/Emoluments/default.aspx