Chernobyl, corruption, dangers of nuclear, environment, France, Kazakhstan, nuclear, nuclear accident, nuclear disaster, nuclear energy, nuclear industry, nuclear power, nuclear weapons, Putin, risk management, Russia, Urals
Update: Germany blames Russia: “Analyses as to the origin of the radioactive substance ruthenium-106 suggest a high probability of a radioactive release in the Southern Ural, although other areas in the South of Russia cannot be ruled out. See: “Low concentrations of ruthenium-106 detected in Europa” https://www.bfs.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/BfS/EN/2017/1003-ruthenium-106.html Germany’s BfS says that since it is only Ruthenium 106, it’s not from a nuclear power station, but could be from nuclear fuel reprocessing. It is also used to treat eye cancer and for radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG) used to power satellites, they say.
From RFERL: https://www.rferl.org/a/radioactive-cloud-irsn-russia-kazakstan/28846324.html
“French Nuclear Watchdog: Radioactive Cloud In Europe Came From Russia Or Kazakhstan, November 10, 2017 09:43 GMT, RFE/RL
A cloud of radioactive pollution over Europe in late September likely originated from a nuclear facility in Russia or Kazakhstan, the French nuclear safety institute IRSN said.
In a November 9 statement, IRSN ruled out an accident in a nuclear reactor, saying it was a likely leak in a nuclear fuel-treatment site or center for radioactive medicine.
In recent weeks, IRSN and several other nuclear safety institutes in Europe had measured high levels of ruthenium 106, a radioactive nuclide which does not occur naturally and is the product of splitting atoms in a nuclear reactor.
Because of its short half-life of about one year, ruthenium 106 is used in nuclear medicine.
There has been no impact on human health or the environment in Europe, said IRSN, the technical arm of the French nuclear regulator ASN.
The IRSN statement said it could not accurately locate the release of radioactive material but, based on weather patterns, it most likely originated south of the Ural Mountains, between the Urals and the Volga River.
A graphic published on the IRSN’s website showing a radiation emission that probably originated in Russia or Kazakhstan.
This could indicate Russia or possibly Kazakhstan as the site of the origin of the cloud, IRSN Director Jean-Marc Peres told the Reuters news agency.
“Russian authorities have said they are not aware of an accident on their territory,” Peres said. Representatives of Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Physics Institute in Almaty told RFE/RL on November 10 that there were no nuclear leaks detected in Kazakhstan in September and October.
Officials at the Kazakh Institute of Radiation Security and Ecology in the town of Kurchatov, in the East-Kazkahstan region, said Kazakhstan does not have facilities from which ruthenium may go into the air as the result of an accident.
The institute in Kurchatov used to be the center of operations of the Soviet-era Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Polygon and is currently working to monitor nuclear safety.
Measurements from European stations showed high levels of ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries at the beginning of October, with a steady decrease from October 6 onwards.
IRSN estimated that the initial quantity of ruthenium 106 released was major, and that if an accident of this magnitude had happened in France it would have required the evacuation or sheltering of all the people in a radius of a few kilometers around the accident site.
With reporting by RFE/RL’s Kazakh Service, Reuters, and http://www.dw.com
Copyright (c) 2017. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave NW, Ste 400, Washington DC 20036” https://www.rferl.org/a/radioactive-cloud-irsn-russia-kazakstan/28846324.html (Emphasis our own.)