Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama Brandenburg Gate 2013
Obama Germany 2013
Why was Obama always more wildly popular in Germany than in America?
So, did the US mislead everyone about the amount of German Nuclear waste that they want to import to dump, and probably bury, in America? As Germans would say “Jein” – yes and no. While the document leads one to believe that it is “only” one tonne, rather than 200, the truth lies in the DOE text – kinda, sorta – if one knows how to look. Supposedly, US HEU comprised 1 gram of the 200 gram nuclear fuel balls for Pebble Bed reactors. However, there is sound reason to suspect that even this is not US origin, but rather German, Dutch, or British.
Rad Waste Barrels WCS Texas
A probable final destination of German nuclear waste, according to the US DOE, is WCS in West Texas. While it is concrete lined, the concrete will crack due to wet-dry expansion and contraction of clay. And, the buried waste barrels will corrode, and leach and probably explode. It’s not a question of if, only when.
WIPP 22 May 2014
Waste at America’s most sophisticated nuclear waste dump – WIPP; Some German waste may go there; Foreign plutonium is supposed to be sent there, along with US plutonium, according to US government documents published in August and December of 2015
The US DOE has unofficially (not published in Federal Register) extended the German waste dumping comment deadline. To be anonymous you will have to send a disposable email, or send it by post with no return address. People should have the right to “vote” anonymously. “Comments may be submitted by email to GermanSpentNuclearFuelEA@leidos.com. Direct written comments on the Draft Spent Nuclear Fuel from Germany EA to Tracy Williams, NEPA Compliance Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, P.O. Box B, Aiken, South Carolina 29802. DOE has extended the public comment period in response to several requests. The public comment period now ends March 25, 2016. DOE will consider all comments received via email by 11:59PM Eastern Standard Time or postmarked by that date. Comments submitted after that date and time will be considered to the extent practicable.http://energy.gov/nepa/ea-1977-acceptance-and-disposition-spent-nuclear-fuel-containing-us-origin-highly-enriched The formal deadline was March 11 at 11.59 pm: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOE_FRDOC_0001-3020

Best choice from the Draft Environmental Assessment:
2.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE: Under the No Action Alternative, the spent nuclear fuel containing U.S.-origin uranium from the AVR and THTR would not be transported to the United States for management and disposition. The spent nuclear fuel would remain in storage in Germany and the impacts described in Chapter 4 of this Draft EA would not occur.http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/01/f28/Draft%20DOE%20EA%201977_FOR%20PUBLIC.pdf

Oliver Krischer, (Green Party) Member of the German Bundestag (parliament) starts off his letter opposing the export of German nuclear waste to America, as follows: “I am deeply concerned about the US/German plans to reprocess and store about 200,000 kg of commercial German pebble fuel elements from the nuclear power plants AVR Juelich (15 MWel) and THTR-300 (300 MWel) at SRS.” Thus, he clues everyone in on the fact that it is not one metric tonne, but rather 200 metric tonnes. [The reason everyone’s supposed to love metric is these easy conversions – 1,000 kg is 1 metric tonne, etc.]

While they will be stored for around 10 years, probably under cloth tents, at SRS (Savannah River Nuclear Site), the Draft “Environmental Assessment” makes clear that most likely most, or all, will be eventually diluted and buried in Utah, West Texas, or where-ever else they decide to bury it. The radioactive waste will, of course, come back up in the form of leaks and probably explosions. The Beatty explosion and the Missouri fire and leak are America’s constant future with the burial of radioactive waste.

The US DOE “Draft Environmental Assessment” states on the first page summary “This spent fuel is in the form of small graphite (carbon) spheres, referred to as “pebbles.” There are approximately one million pebbles currently in storage in 455 CASTOR casks. The pebbles contain varying quantities of uranium and thorium, with uranium enrichments up to 81 percent. Prior to irradiation, the fuel contained approximately 900 kilograms (1,980 pounds) of HEU” On summary page 2 they do state “As a result of irradiation and decay, the spent nuclear fuel also contains actinides, fission products, and other radioactive isotopes.” DOE/EA-1977, In short, it is being returned with really nasty, lethal, man-made radioactive materials. However, this statement about the 900 kg appears designed to confuse and deceive. And, yet, the truth lurks in the document – more or less – if one knows what to look for.

On p. 2-3 they tell us that “The spent nuclear fuel DOE is considering for acceptance and disposition consists of approximately 1 million graphite spheres or pebbles currently in storage in CASTOR casks at two locations in Germany. The number of pebbles in a cask varies, but on average there are about 2,200 pebbles per cask. As depicted in Figure 2-2, each pebble is approximately 60 millimeters (2.4 inches) in diameter and is composed of approximately 200 grams of graphite surrounding the fuel kernels; each sphere contains from 10,000 to 35,000 fuel kernels with varying quantities of uranium and thorium with uranium enrichments up to 81 percent. The fuel contained approximately 900 kilograms (1,980 pounds) of HEU prior to irradiation (Schütte 2012).” DOE/EA-1977 http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/01/f28/Draft%20DOE%20EA%201977_FOR%20PUBLIC.pdf

While the DOE’s Draft EA hints that the pebbles weigh around 200 grams, they don’t really tell us. They state that the graphite is this weight, and seem to imply that the HEU was huge. However, an old EC document explains: “The fuel element (Fig. 1.1) is composed of a 50 mm-diameter core of graphite and coated particles containing a uranium thorium mixture. The core is surrounded by a 5 mm thick layer of reactor grade graphite.” They state that the Mass is 200 grams. Furthermore, “Each element contains approximately 1 g of highly enriched uranium as fissile element and 5 g of thorium (AVR pebble) or 10 g (THTR fuel) as fertile element.” (p. 1) See also page 7 for more clarity. Commission of the European Communities, “SIGMA-R: AN IMPROVED VERSION OF THE DELAYED NEUTRON COUNTING DEVICE FOR “THTR” FUEL ELEMENT VERIFICATION” by P. AGOSTINI, et. al. [1]

So, if you multiply the 1 million in the US DOE Draft EA x 200 grams then you get 200,000,000 grams, 200,000 kg and 200 metric tonnes. This is exactly the amount given by the German parliamentarian, Oliver Krischer. You can, of course, multiply the 2,200 nuclear waste “pebbles” per cask x 200 g and then multiply it by the 455 spent fuel casks and arrive at almost exactly the same figures. So, was the amount to be dumped on America hidden in the DOE Draft EA document, prepared for public comment? The answer is clearly Jein, yes and no: the amount to be shipped was, and wasn’t, hidden in plain sight.

While Oliver Krischer says that the fuel balls were 96% German made, it appears clear that 99.5% was probably NOT American made, since only 1 gram out of 200 grams was HEU (Highly Enriched Uranium), according to the EC document. The 3.5% difference may be import-processing of thorium from someplace else.

Logic suggests that actually none of the HEU, or almost none, was US origin. Why? Because Nukem, starting in 1971, was one of the initial owners of URENCO which enriches uranium! Furthermore, around this time period, URENCO was accused of giving centrifuge enrichment technology to Pakistan. It is possible that the HEU for the first few years came from the US for the AVR, only. One can estimate that 77 kg might be of US origin material. However, since Rio Tinto was still a partner in Nukem in this earlier period, it may have come from the UK. Furthermore, this enrichment technology was known in Europe in the 1960s. Most likely all of the original HEU was German, or possibly Dutch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zippe-type_centrifuge Most likely not one iota of this 200 tonnes ever had anything to do with America.

If the US supplied HEU to the AVR Pebble Bed prior to 1971, and the AVR reached criticality in 1966 and was opened until 1988 and there are 155 casks of AVR spent fuel (the rest is THTR spent fuel), then there are only around 35 casks, which might have US origin HEU. With 2,200 pebbles per cask this would be 2,200 x 200 g, which is 440,000 g, which is 440 kg of spent fuel x 35, which is 15400 kg (15.4 tonnes). However, the former HEU would be 1 gram only out of the 200 gram (half a percent), so would be 77 kg of possible US origin HEU material, not 900 kg as the US DOE claims.

An official Nukem (DE-Germany) history mentions them getting LEU (low enriched uranium) from the USA in the early 1970s. And, an enrichment contract for nuclear fuel with Russian Tenex, in this period. German-Dutch-British URENCO still enriches uranium – about 1/3 of the uranium in the world, and all of the uranium enrichment in the US – at least for commercial purposes. They appear to have been ramping down their Dutch site, and in its stead, be ramping up ops in America. Nukem was recently purchased by Cameco and Urenco is currently owned by the UK and Dutch governments, along with German utilities RWE and E.On.

The whole US “non-proliferation” hoax is also a scam because Juelich Research Center, maker of the AVR waste balls, and now tied in with overall German waste disposal, via JEN-EWN, actually works with URENCO and AREVA via ETC on enrichment facility design and services/gas-centrifuge technology! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urenco_Group The Djinn is out of the bottle with the recent creation, last September, of JEN. The German waste innovation “technology” is really a plot to make America Germany’s nuclear waste dump. Even German journalists have noted the Nazi roots of the German Nuclear Industrial Complex. Surely bilingual Nazis have stayed up long nights coming up with innovative German words which have ominous double entendres in English like NUKEM, and letting the Djinn (Jen) or Ginnie out of the bottle. There is Uranit (wit?) too.

So, in other words, the US may take old nuclear waste from an entity which is very capable of making new highly enriched uranium (HEU). And, German-Dutch-UK Urenco currently has the only commercial enrichment facility in the US. Oak Ridge may still be able to do some uranium enrichment for non-commercial purposes. Nukem has long been “one of the world’s largest intermediaries in the international nuclear fuel market.” It was recently (2012) sold to Canadian Cameco. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nukem_Energy The history at the link is misleading. According to the official Nukem history, Nukem was German with a minority state by Rio Tinto (18%) starting in 1965: German (Nazi) Degussa (45.0%), German RWE (25.0%), UK Rio Tinto (18.0%), German Metallgesellschaft (12.0%). (The official site doesn’t inform us that Degussa was a notorious Nazi company, but it was.) Germany was also a major, historic, uranium mining country. So, will Germany take all of its waste back – return to sender? Turn around is fair play! Germany had better really be looking for a huge storage site if they are going to play this return to sender game.

Tom D’Agostino (pictured below) who agreed to accept this nuclear waste on the US end, now works for Fluor. Fluor and large Obama donor Exelon were initially involved with URENCO, when it first tried to set up a US enrichment facility, in Louisiana. Louisiana (and Tennessee) chased them away and URENCO ended up in New Mexico. Besides ties to URENCO, Fluor operates the Savannah River Site. So, there is a double tie to Fluor.
Tom D'Agostino US DOE
Thus, the US DOE appears clearly to be trying to mislead people about the amount and origin of the spent nuclear fuel. According to German parliamentarian Oliver Krishner, “The fuel elements were mainly (96 %) fabricated in Germany at Nukem, US origin is only the HEU content (830 kg).” This 830 kg is significantly under the 900 kg given by the US DOE. Krishner informs us that because of severe nuclear accidents this spent nuclear fuel is probably “in very bad shape“, which means that they will probably produce “huge amounts of secondary waste“: “As an independent official experts group outlined 2014, there were several severe accidents in AVR reactor (which were hushed up for decades). The fuel elements are thus in a very bad shape. Their reprocessing will probably produce huge amounts of secondary waste, which will hinder the intended cleaning of the SRS site. About 4 % of the THTR fuel elements are broken with probably similar consequences.” His letter and link to original found here: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/200-tonnes-of-high-level-nuclear-waste-spent-nuclear-fuel-to-be-dumped-on-america-nuclear-fuel-was-96-german-made-oppose-until-11-march-11-59-pm-us-eastern-time-one-minute-to-midnight/

HOBEG fuel fabrication facility, which apparently made the Pebble Bed nuclear fuel balls, was owned by Nukem. However, NUKEM, or its subsidiaries, apparently made nuclear fuel prior to this time. In 1971 NUKEM was one of the founders of Urenco via Uranit GmbH.

The German and Dutch Nuclear Industrial Complex has played a major role in nuclear proliferation, which is mostly over-looked. The German Juelich Research Center, home of the AVR Pebble Bed and its nasty radioactive waste, is right there in the middle: “In the 1970s, Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan who worked for a subcontractor of URENCO in Almelo, brought the drawings of the centrifuges operated by Urenco to Pakistan by notifying the URENCO administration and the Dutch government. Those blueprints were taken from URENCO administration and they knew about this fact. In the early 1974, Dr. Khan joined the uranium enrichment programme, launched by Munir Ahmad Khan under Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Prime minister that time. Later, he took over the project, and established a facility that produces the HEU based. Within a short span of time established a highly advanced uranium enrichment facility near Islamabad.
[…]
Urenco also owns a 50% interest in Enrichment Technology Company (nl) (ETC), a company jointly owned with Areva. ETC provides enrichment-plant design services and gas-centrifuge technology for enrichment plants through its subsidiaries in the UK (Capenhurst), Germany (Gronau and Jülich), the Netherlands (Almelo), France (Tricastin) and the U.S. (Eunice, New Mexico)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urenco_Group

About the owner of the Ahaus waste facility, which would be 93% emptied out if sent to America, thus making room for nuclear waste from the owner-utilities: “The shareholders of the Gesellschaft für Nuklear Service are E.ON (48%), RWE (28%), EnBW (18.5%) and Vattenfall (5.5%). The company is for 75% owner of the Deutsche Gesellschaft zum Bau und Betrieb von Endlagern für Abfallstoffe (DBE).[2] The company manufactures two dry cask storage systems, CASTOR and CONSTOR.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportbehälterlager_Ahaus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesellschaft_für_Nuklear-Service

Note [1] The EC document link: http://bookshop.europa.eu/es/sigma-r-an-improved-version-of-the-delayed-neutron-counting-device-for-thtr-fuel-element-verification-pbCDNA12059/downloads/CD-NA-12059-EN-C/CDNA12059ENC_001.pdf;pgid=y8dIS7GUWMdSR0EAlMEUUsWb0000LHkzPjtz;sid=cMKXNd_kKaWXJYxgFm4Jkr3BPaGJR30nDJI=?FileName=CDNA12059ENC_001.pdf&SKU=CDNA12059ENC_PDF&CatalogueNumber=CD-NA-12059-EN-C

Corruption involving (German) Nukem, and Juelich :
JPRS-TND-88-005 14 March 1988 http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA345472

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/02/07/world/nuclear-industry-under-fire-in-bonn.html

Here the DOE Draft EA makes clear that WCS of Texas and the EnergySolutions Clive dump in Utah are likely targets:
Transport-Burial German Nuclear Waste in USA chart