Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

US NPS Trail of Tears
A Journey of Injustice
Remember and commemorate the survival of the Cherokee people, forcefully removed from their homelands…
http://www.nps.gov/trte/index.htm They were forced westward to make room for European and Other Nuclear Waste?

How the US Handles Its Plutonium And Other Transuranic Waste (WIPP in 2014)
WIPP 22 May 2014

German Nuclear Waste (Spent Nuclear Fuel) on the Way – Until March 11th to Object: Comment deadline is March 11: “Environmental Assessments; Availability, etc.: Acceptance and Disposition of Spent Nuclear Fuel“. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOE_FRDOC_0001-3020 (Can be anonymous.) See draft EA: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/01/f28/Draft%20DOE%20EA%201977_FOR%20PUBLIC.pdf

US NPS Map showing that South Carolina was Cherokee and they were gradually forced westward.
shrinking Cherokee lands
http://www.nps.gov/trte/planyourvisit/upload/Official-Map-Guide-brochure-2012_interp.pdf

When will Europe and the rest of world stop seeing the US as its dumping ground – first of unwanted people and now of its unwanted radioactive waste? What sense does it have to steal a land from the Natives only to destroy it, especially at the behest of third parties? By what right? The Cherokee didn’t leave their homes willingly as seen in this 1760 massacre just upriver from the Savannah River site: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Cane_Massacre_Site Many lesser known American Indian tribes, such as the Cusabo, were also forced off the land, merged with other tribes, enslaved or killed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cusabo

Americans need to stand up and stop the country from becoming the world’s dumping ground for radioactive waste. There were apparently attempts to import some of this waste in the past, but people laid down in the roads to stop it. Now Germans seem more interested in stopping it than Americans. The location is such that it is actually more of a menace to the Atlantic, and countries facing the Atlantic.

Unwanted Nuclear Material Arrives in America
Oceanic Pintail Charleston SC photo by Savannah River Site Watch
Savannah River Site Watch photo of the Oceanic Pintail at Charleston, SC: http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/srsw_on_pintail_to_charleston_feb_17_2016.pdf

Plutonium from Japan is on the way, as explained below.

Press Release from Savannah River Site Watch:

February 17, 2016

Ship Arrives in Charleston, South Carolina with Nuclear Cargo Destined for Savannah River Site; Cargo Believed to be Plutonium from Germany and Switzerland in Advance of Nuclear Security Summit

UK-Flagged Oceanic Pintail Arrives from Europe on February 14, Departs February 15

Columbia, South Carolina – A ship dedicated to transport of nuclear materials arrived in the port of Charleston, South Carolina on February 14, with a secret cargo of nuclear materials bound for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS), according to Savannah River Site Watch, which witnessed the departure of the vessel. (See photos linked in “notes” below and at http://www.srswatch.org).

The U.K.-flagged Oceanic Pintail delivered its cargo to the non-public dock in the Joint Base Charleston and departed on February 15 after 12-hour layover at a South Carolina Ports Authority pier. The Pintail is one of but four specialized ships dedicated to nuclear cargo transport and which are based in Barrow-in-Furness, U.K., near the U.K’s Sellafield nuclear site.

The cargo remains officially secret but is believed to consist ofplutonium from Germany and Switzerland, possibly in the form of unirradiated plutonium fuel (MOX). DOE is likely bringing the material into SRS at this time in order to make an announcement about it at the Nuclear Security Summit to be held in Washington, DC from March 31-April 1. That announcement will avoid to touchy issue of there being no viable or funded manner for disposal of the material at SRS, meaning it has come into South Carolina with no plans for its exit, making the shipment a hollow nuclear non-proliferation “success,” according to SRS Watch.

German media reported the departure on January 26 from the port of Nordenham of a ship carrying a secret cargo of nuclear materials from Germany and Switzerland. Two other similar nuclear-transport vessels – the Pacific Egret and Pacific Heron are on a secret mission to pick up 331 kilograms of plutonium in Japan and bring it to SRS, where it will be stranded.

In response to an SRS Watch inquiry about the shipment on board the Oceanic Pintail, the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration responded on February 16 that the “NNSA has no comment.”

“As the shipment has concluded there is no longer any reason from a security perspective for DOE to be silent as to the nature of the cargo and what will become of it at SRS,” said Tom Clements, director of SRS Watch. “DOE’s silence aims only to keep the public in the dark about various nuclear materials that are being brought to SRS with no disposition plans, obligating SRS Watch to fill the void in educating the public about nuclear shipments making the one-way trip into SRS,” added Clements.

The shipment onboard the Pintail is likely part of 900 kilograms of “gap” plutonium planned to be imported to SRS. DOE analyzed the import of that plutonium in an “environmental assessment” (EA) prepared in secret and released on December 28, 2015.

The operator of the Oceanic Pintail, International Nuclear Services, confirms in a fact sheet that the Pintail brought plutonium from Sweden to SRS in 2012: “With a track record of safely carrying Mox and high level radioactive waste across the world, and most recently separate plutonium from Sweden to the USA, Oceanic Pintail is available for the most complex of nuclear transport projects, including high security movements.”

###
Notes:
Photos of Oceanic Pintail departing Charleston, South Carolina – photos can be used with credit to ©Savannah River Site Watch, more photos available on request and posted on http://www.srswatch.org: http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/7626526.jpg http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/9375337.jpg http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/5844779.jpg

Article in German media on departure of nuclear shipment on January 26, 2016: Atomtransport Durch Die Wesermarsch – Bundesamt verrät Route aus Sicherheitsgründen nicht, NWZ Online, January 28, 2016: http://www.nwzonline.de/wesermarsch/wirtschaft/von-schweiz-ueber-nordenham-in-usa_a_6,0,3594114857.html

SRS Watch news release, February 6, 2016 on passage of Pacific Heron and Pacific Egret through the Panama Canal – to pick up 331 kilograms of plutonium in Japan, to bring to SRS — UK-Flagged Ships Set to Transport Plutonium from Japan to US Located in Panama Canal! – Ships on Secret Mission to Carry 331 Kilograms of Plutonium to US DOE’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina as Part of Nuclear Security Summit Preparation; Plutonium to be Stranded at SRS: http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/srsw_news_on_plutonim_ships_in_canal_feb_6_ 2016.pdf

GTRI Removal Program Overview, December 3, 2014 (GTRI is now Office of Material Management and Minimization), see page 14 for mention of 30 kgs of plutonium in Germany and 18 kgs in Switzerland planned to be brought to the US: http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/nrsb/miscellaneous/Dickerson.pdf

DOE’s Environmental Assessment, Gap Material Plutonium – Transport, Receipt, and Processing, December 28, 2015: http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-2024-final-environmental-assessment

Factsheet on Oceanic Pintail, by International Nuclear Services: http://www.innuserv.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/INS_Oceanic_data.pdf

White House factsheet on plutonium removal from Sweden (to SRS), March 26, 2012: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/26/fact-sheet-plutonium-removal-sweden

Contact: Tom Clements Director, Savannah River Site Watch http://www.srswatch.org/ https://www.facebook.com/SavannahRiverSiteWatch” (Emphasis our own. See original here:
http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/srsw_on_pintail_to_charleston_feb_17_2016.pdf

The original press release states that the plutonium is believed US origin but why would that be? It also states it may be Gap plutonium which is Non-US Origin Plutonium that no one wants so the US gets it. Germany has nuclear reactors and research institutes, as does Switzerland, and thus make their own plutonium, as part of the nuclear fuel chain. Here is the Karlsruhe research institute: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Transuranium_Elements The French and the British make MOX fuel. Shouldn’t plutonium which has been played around with for over half a century get Swiss and German citizenship, whether or not it came from there? If they benefitted shouldn’t they keep it? It reminds me of the country kids who used to ask if they could borrow a kleenex. No, keep the kleenex and the plutonium.