Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mercury Emissions  "Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards", EPA-452/R-11-011 December 2011
“Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards”, EPA-452/R-11-011 December 2011 http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf

The US EPA wasn’t even stopping mercury emissions, but was merely trying to reduce them! (The standard involves more than just filtering mercury, too.) The US waited 72 years to protect hat-makers from mercury! Even France did better, though it took 29 years! “In 1869, the French Academy of Medicine demonstrated the health hazards posed to hatmakers. Alternatives to mercury use in hatmaking became available by 1874. In the United States, a hydrochloride-based process was patented in 1888 to obviate the use of mercury, but was ignored.[10]/. In 1898, legislation was passed in France to protect hatmakers from the risks of mercury exposure. By the turn of the 20th century, mercury poisoning among British hatters had become a rarity.[6][11]/ In the United States, the mercury-based process continued to be adopted until as late as 1941, when it was abandoned mainly due to the wartime need for the heavy metal in the manufacture of detonators.[8][10] Thus, for much of the 20th century mercury poisoning remained common in the U.S. hatmaking industries, including those located in Danbury, Connecticut (giving rise to the expression the “Danbury shakes”).[6][7]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_hatter_disease
"Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards", EPA-452/R-11-011 December 2011 EPA Costs
“Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards”, EPA-452/R-11-011 December 2011 http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting , p. 1
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting , p. 2
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting , p. 3
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting, p. 4
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting, p. 5
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting, p. 6
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting, p. 7
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)  KAGAN, J., dissenting  p.8
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)
KAGAN, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Nos. 14–46, 14–47, and 14–49

READ THE ENTIRE DISSENT HERE: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-46_10n2.pdf
(THE BLINKERED MAJORITY RULING APPEARS FIRST; THEN THE DISSENT; Red, black,yellow Emphasis added here and bold added for Wikipedia.)

KAGAN’S FATHER WAS A LAWYER. SCALIA’S FATHER WAS AN ITALIAN WHO TAUGHT ITALIAN TO AMERICANS.

See: “Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards”, EPA-452/R-11-011 December 2011 http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf

WILL THE POPE EX-COMMUNICATE SCALIA? BE ON THE LOOK OUT TO SEE IF SCALIA HAS A NEW FERRARI AS HE HAD FERRARIS ON HIS MIND AND COMPARED WANTING TO MAKE THE UTILITIES FILTER MERCURY TO BUYING A FERRARI! WAS HE PROMISED A FERRARI IN EXCHANGE FOR HIS “BLINKERED” MAT AS A HATTER RULING?